Last quarter, I analyzed CRM usage across 50 salespeople at my former company. The data shocked me: the top 10% updated their CRM 3x less frequently than everyone else. Yet their close rate was 2.5x higher.
For two years, I spent 2 hours every day updating Salesforce. Every call, every email, every next step—meticulously logged. I hit 67% of quota on average.
Sarah, our top performer, updated her CRM once a week. Usually on Friday afternoons. She closed 180% of quota.
I thought she was lazy. I was wrong.
The Data Didn't Lie
I spent six months tracking 50 salespeople across three metrics:
- Daily CRM input time (avg: 87 minutes)
- Update frequency (avg: 3.2x per day)
- Close rate (avg: 31%)
The correlation was clear—and backwards.
| Group | CRM Time/Day | Close Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10% | 28 minutes | 78% |
| Middle 60% | 95 minutes | 29% |
| Bottom 30% | 124 minutes | 18% |
The salespeople spending the most time in CRM were performing the worst.
So what?
For months, our VP of Sales had been pushing "CRM discipline" as the key to better performance. Weekly 1-on-1s focused on pipeline hygiene. Dashboard reviews consumed every Monday morning.
The message was clear: more CRM = better sales.
But here's the thing: we were measuring the wrong outcome.
I Asked Sarah What She Was Doing
Six months into my analysis, I finally asked Sarah directly.
"Why don't you update your CRM every day?"
She looked at me like I'd asked why she didn't polish her stapler.
"Because customers don't care about my CRM," she said. "I update it when I have downtime. But when I'm with a customer—on a call, writing a proposal, solving their problem—that's where deals happen. Not in Salesforce."
The irony was perfect. I'd been so focused on recording my activities that I'd forgotten to focus on the activities themselves.
The System-of-Record Trap
Most CRMs are built as Systems of Record. They're designed to:
- Track what happened
- Store customer data
- Generate reports for management
- Provide visibility into the pipeline
All valuable. All necessary.
But none of that helps a salesperson in the moment of selling.
Sarah didn't hate CRM because she was undisciplined. She hated it because it was optimized for managers, not for her.
Every minute she spent updating Salesforce was a minute she wasn't:
- Calling a prospect
- Writing a personalized proposal
- Researching a customer's industry
- Following up on a warm lead
The CRM demanded input. It offered nothing in return.
What Top Performers Do Differently
I interviewed the top 10% of our sales team. Here's what they had in common:
1. They prioritize action over documentation
- Sarah kept notes in a simple text file during calls
- She batch-updated CRM on Fridays when prospects were unavailable
- Her rule: "If it doesn't help me close a deal this week, I do it later"
2. They use the CRM as a tool, not a task
- They extract value (contact info, deal history, next steps)
- They minimize input (only what's required for forecasting)
- They ignore fields that don't matter to them
3. They optimize for Revenue per Input Hour
- Average salesperson: $450 revenue per hour of CRM input
- Top 10%: $2,100 revenue per hour of CRM input
- They weren't lazy—they were efficient
The Real Problem: We're Measuring the Wrong Thing
Our VP of Sales was tracking:
- CRM adoption rate (% of team logging in daily)
- Pipeline data quality (% of required fields filled)
- Update frequency (avg updates per rep per day)
These metrics optimized for management visibility, not sales performance.
When we shifted to tracking Revenue per Input Hour, everything changed.
Suddenly, Sarah wasn't the problem. The 30% of reps spending 2+ hours daily in CRM were the problem.
What If CRM Were a System of Action?
Here's what Sarah told me she actually needed:
"Tell me which 3 deals to focus on this week."
Not a dashboard with 47 open opportunities. Not a pipeline report with color-coded stages. Just: these three deals have the highest probability of closing this month. Focus here.
"Auto-draft my follow-up emails."
She didn't need to log that she sent an email. She needed the email written for her, personalized to the customer's context, ready to review and send in 60 seconds.
"Alert me when a deal is about to slip."
Not a weekly pipeline review. A real-time notification: Deal with Acme Corp hasn't had activity in 8 days. Close rate drops 40% after 10 days of silence. Suggested action: send this message.
This isn't a System of Record. It's a System of Action.
It doesn't ask for input—it provides output.
It doesn't demand documentation—it accelerates decisions.
It doesn't optimize for visibility—it optimizes for velocity.
The Paradigm Shift
The best salespeople don't hate CRM because they're undisciplined.
They hate it because it's designed for the wrong user.
Traditional CRM optimizes for:
- Managers who need visibility
- Forecasting teams who need data
- Executives who need reports
AI-native CRM should optimize for:
- Salespeople who need to close deals faster
- Teams who need to spend less time on admin
- Companies who need revenue per human hour
This is the design philosophy we built Optifai around—not a better System of Record, but a fundamentally different System of Action.
The metrics should change:
❌ CRM adoption rate
✅ Revenue per input hour
❌ Pipeline data quality
✅ Time saved per week
❌ Update frequency
✅ Deals closed per manual action
What I Changed
After six months of data and dozens of conversations with top performers, I made three changes:
1. Stopped measuring CRM usage
- Removed "CRM discipline" from performance reviews
- Stopped weekly pipeline hygiene meetings
- Focused 1-on-1s on deal strategy, not data entry
2. Reduced required fields by 70%
- From 23 required fields to 7
- Only captured data that informed next actions
- Everything else became optional
3. Built automation to return value
- Auto-scored deals by close probability
- Suggested next actions based on deal stage
- Pre-drafted follow-up messages using AI
The results:
- Average CRM input time: 87 min/day → 31 min/day
- Close rate: 31% → 44%
- Team morale: significantly higher (qualitative, but real)
Ask Your Top Performers
Here's what I wish I'd done two years earlier:
Ask your best salesperson: "If you could eliminate one tool or process, what would it be?"
If they say "CRM," don't dismiss it as laziness.
Ask: "What would you do with that extra hour every day?"
The answer will tell you what your sales team actually values.
And if the answer is "sell more"—maybe they're right to hate your CRM.
The Bottom Line
Your best salespeople don't hate CRM because they're bad at sales.
They hate it because they're good at sales.
They know that every minute in Salesforce is a minute not in front of a customer.
They know that documentation doesn't close deals—conversations do.
They know that sales is about action, not record-keeping.
So the next time you see low CRM adoption from your top performer, don't assume they're the problem.
Ask yourself: is this tool helping them sell, or just helping me see?
If it's the latter, they're right to ignore it.
What's one thing you could automate this week to give your sales team 30 minutes back?
Start there.
Alex Tanaka is a product developer focused on AI-native sales tools. He spent two years missing quota before realizing the tools were the problem, not the people. He writes about sales, process, and the intersection of AI and revenue.
Top comments (0)