YouTube finally figured out how to make money from Shorts. Only took them, what, three years of watching TikTok and Instagram Reels rake it in? Better late than never, I suppose.
But here's what matters: the monetization update that rolled out in mid-2025 isn't just about YouTube's revenue. It's fundamentally changed how brands should approach short-form video advertising. And most companies are still treating Shorts like they're regular YouTube ads shrunk down to 60 seconds.
They're not.
I've spent the last six months testing these new ad formats across multiple brand accounts (consumer tech, B2B SaaS, and e-commerce). The results have been... interesting. Some campaigns crushed it. Others burned budget faster than you can say "algorithm change."
Let me walk you through what's actually working.
The New Ad Formats (And Why YouTube Needed Them)
YouTube introduced three primary ad formats specifically for Shorts:
Shorts Feed Ads appear between organic Shorts in the feed. They're skippable after 4 seconds, which means you have roughly the attention span of a goldfish to hook viewers. These are the most common format and the easiest entry point for brands.
Sticker Ads overlay the content with interactive elements—think shopping tags, app install buttons, or lead forms. They're less intrusive than traditional overlays but require careful creative strategy. Nobody wants to cover the actual content with a giant "BUY NOW" button.
Shorts Video Reach Campaigns are YouTube's answer to TikTok's TopView ads. Premium placement, premium pricing, and theoretically premium results. The jury's still out on whether they're worth the 3x cost increase.
The technical specs matter here. Vertical video (9:16 ratio), 60 seconds max, and—this is crucial—completely different viewing behavior than regular YouTube content. People watching Shorts are in scroll mode, not search mode. That changes everything about your creative approach.
What's Different About Shorts Monetization (Compared to Regular YouTube)
Here's the thing most brands miss: Shorts viewers aren't on YouTube to watch Shorts. They're scrolling through an infinite feed of dopamine hits, same as TikTok or Reels. The platform might be different, but the behavior is identical.
This means your carefully crafted 30-second brand story with the logo reveal at the end? Dead on arrival.
Regular YouTube ads benefit from intent. Someone searched for "best running shoes" and your ad appears before a review video. There's context. There's receptivity.
Shorts ads appear between a cat video and a cooking hack. Your brand needs to earn attention in milliseconds, not inherit it from search intent.
The monetization model reflects this reality. YouTube's revenue share with creators on Shorts is different from long-form content—they pool ad revenue and distribute based on views and music licensing. For brands, this means your ad performance directly impacts creator earnings, which creates interesting dynamics around ad fatigue and viewer tolerance.
I've noticed that Shorts ads get skipped faster than regular pre-rolls. The average view duration on our test campaigns was 3.2 seconds before users swiped. That's not a typo. Three seconds.
You need to frontload everything.
The Creative Strategy That Actually Converts
Forget everything you know about YouTube ads. Seriously.
The creative approach that works for Shorts is closer to native content than traditional advertising. When we tested polished, production-heavy ads against raw, authentic-looking content, the "amateur" style outperformed by 340% on engagement metrics.
Because it doesn't look like an ad.
Here's the framework that's working:
Hook in 0.5 seconds. Not 3 seconds. Not even 1 second. The first frame needs to pattern-interrupt the scroll. We've had success with unexpected visuals, text overlays with provocative questions, and—surprisingly—intentionally imperfect framing that looks user-generated.
Value before branding. Lead with the benefit, problem, or entertainment. Your logo can wait. One of our e-commerce clients saw a 67% improvement in completion rates when they moved their logo from the first frame to the 8-second mark.
Native format and pacing. If your Short looks like a TV commercial uploaded vertically, you've already lost. Study what's actually popular in the Shorts feed. Quick cuts, text overlays, trending audio, casual delivery. The production value sweet spot is "intentional but not overproduced."
Clear, immediate CTA. You have one ask. Make it obvious. "Link in bio" doesn't work here (Shorts don't have descriptions in the feed). Sticker ads with direct interaction points perform significantly better than verbal CTAs.
We tested this with a SaaS client selling project management software. Their original ad was a 45-second explainer with smooth animations and corporate voiceover. Professional. Polished. Completely ignored.
The winning version? A developer in a hoodie showing one specific feature in 12 seconds with text overlays and a trending sound. Same budget, 4.2x better click-through rate.
Turns out people don't want commercials in their scroll feed. Who knew?
Targeting and Placement: Where the Money Gets Wasted
YouTube's targeting options for Shorts are... let's call them "evolving."
You can target by demographics, interests, and remarketing audiences, same as regular YouTube campaigns. But the effectiveness is wildly inconsistent because the viewing context is so different.
Someone who watches 20-minute tech reviews might also scroll through Shorts, but they're in a completely different mindset. Interest-based targeting assumes consistent behavior across formats. That assumption is expensive.
Here's what's actually working:
Custom Intent audiences built from your website visitors and email lists significantly outperform cold interest targeting. We're seeing 2-3x better conversion rates with warm audiences, which makes sense—they already know your brand, so the ad serves as a reminder rather than an introduction.
Placement exclusions matter more than you'd think. YouTube lets you exclude specific channels and content types, and you absolutely should. We've had ads appear next to... questionable content. Not brand-safe. Set your exclusions aggressively.
Time-of-day targeting shows interesting patterns. Shorts consumption spikes during commute hours (7-9 AM, 5-7 PM) and late evening (9-11 PM). But conversion rates peak mid-afternoon (2-4 PM). Test your campaign objectives against viewing patterns.
Geographic targeting needs to be tighter than regular YouTube campaigns. Shorts consumption varies dramatically by region, and CPMs fluctuate accordingly. We've found success focusing on tier-1 cities initially, then expanding based on performance data.
The biggest money pit? Broad interest targeting with "awareness" as the goal. Yes, you'll get millions of impressions. No, they won't remember your brand five seconds later. The scroll is ruthless.
Budget Allocation and Bidding Strategy
Let's talk numbers.
Shorts ads are cheaper than regular YouTube ads on a CPM basis—we're seeing $4-8 CPMs compared to $12-20 for in-stream ads. Sounds great until you realize the engagement rates are also lower.
The effective cost per meaningful interaction (not just impression) ends up being comparable, sometimes higher.
Start with $50-100 daily budget minimum. Anything less and the algorithm doesn't have enough data to optimize. YouTube's machine learning needs volume to find your audience in the Shorts feed.
Bidding strategy matters more than budget size. We've tested Target CPM, Maximum CPV, and Target CPA across multiple campaigns:
- Target CPM works for awareness campaigns where you want maximum reach. You'll get impressions, but quality varies wildly.
- Maximum CPV gives you more control but requires constant monitoring. Good for testing creative variations.
- Target CPA is the winner for conversion-focused campaigns, but only after you have conversion data. Start with CPV, switch to CPA after 50+ conversions.
One critical detail: YouTube's attribution window for Shorts is shorter than regular ads. They count engaged views (10+ seconds) and clicks within 3 days for conversions. Your actual influence might extend longer, but the platform won't credit it.
This affects how you evaluate ROI. We've started tracking branded search lift and direct traffic alongside platform attribution to get the full picture. Spoiler: the real impact is usually 20-30% higher than YouTube reports.
Integration with Broader Content Strategy
Here's where it gets interesting.
Shorts ads work best when they're part of a larger YouTube presence, not isolated campaigns. Brands that publish organic Shorts regularly see 40-60% better ad performance. The algorithm seems to reward consistency.
Think of it like this: YouTube wants Shorts to succeed. They're competing with TikTok and Instagram. Brands that invest in the ecosystem (organic content + paid promotion) get preferential treatment in the feed.
We've seen this play out with a consumer electronics brand. When they ran Shorts ads without any organic presence, CPC averaged $1.80. After publishing 3-4 organic Shorts weekly for a month, then running the same ads, CPC dropped to $0.94.
Same ads. Same targeting. Different results.
This connects to broader content strategy principles—you can't just show up with a checkbook and expect results. The platform rewards participation, not just spending. Similar to how AI in content marketing requires integration across multiple touchpoints, Shorts success depends on ecosystem thinking.
Your organic Shorts don't need to go viral. They need to establish presence and signal to YouTube that you're invested in the format. Consistency beats viral moments for long-term ad performance.
Measurement and Attribution (The Messy Reality)
YouTube's reporting for Shorts campaigns is... incomplete.
You'll get standard metrics: impressions, views, view rate, clicks, conversions. But the granularity isn't there yet. You can't easily separate Shorts Feed Ads from Sticker Ads in reporting. Audience retention data is limited. A/B testing requires manual campaign duplication.
It's functional but frustrating.
Here's how we're actually measuring success:
Primary metrics: View-through rate (VTR) above 15%, click-through rate (CTR) above 1.5%, and cost per conversion within your target CPA. These benchmarks come from our own testing—YouTube doesn't publish official benchmarks yet.
Secondary metrics: Earned actions (likes, shares, follows) and branded search lift. If your Shorts ads are working, people should be searching for your brand afterward. Set up Google Trends monitoring and Search Console tracking.
Attribution modeling: Use UTM parameters aggressively and set up view-through conversion tracking in Google Analytics. YouTube's native attribution misses a lot of the customer journey.
The honest truth? Full attribution is still messy. Someone sees your Short ad, doesn't click, searches for your brand two days later, and converts. YouTube doesn't get credit, but the ad worked.
We've started using brand lift studies (YouTube offers these for larger campaigns) and incrementality testing to understand true impact. It's more work, but it's the only way to know if you're actually driving results or just buying vanity metrics.
What's Coming Next (And How to Prepare)
YouTube is clearly doubling down on Shorts. The platform hit 70 billion daily views in late 2025, and monetization is finally catching up to usage.
Expect more ad formats. YouTube is testing Shopping Shorts (integrated e-commerce), Interactive Shorts (choose-your-own-adventure style), and Creator Partnership Ads (brands co-creating with YouTubers).
The platform is also improving targeting with AI-driven audience discovery. Translation: less manual targeting, more algorithmic optimization. This will help smaller brands compete, but it'll also increase competition for attention.
CPMs will likely rise as more brands adopt Shorts advertising. We're already seeing 15-20% increases quarter-over-quarter in competitive categories like finance and tech.
Here's how to prepare:
Build your organic Shorts library now. Establish presence before CPMs get prohibitive. Test content formats, build audience, learn what resonates.
Develop short-form creative capabilities. If you're still thinking in 30-second TV spots, you're behind. Invest in creators, tools, and processes for rapid short-form production.
Test attribution models. Don't rely solely on platform reporting. Build your own measurement framework that captures the full customer journey.
Watch TikTok and Instagram. Whatever works there will eventually work on Shorts. The formats are converging, and creative best practices transfer across platforms.
The brands winning with Shorts in 2025 aren't treating it as a side channel or experimental budget. They're integrating it into core strategy, investing in format-specific creative, and measuring beyond surface metrics.
The Bottom Line
YouTube Shorts monetization is real, functional, and—for the right brands—highly effective. But it requires a different approach than traditional YouTube advertising.
Stop thinking in TV commercials. Start thinking in scroll-stopping moments.
Stop optimizing for completion rate. Start optimizing for immediate impact.
Stop treating Shorts as cheap YouTube ads. Start treating them as a distinct format with distinct rules.
The brands seeing 3x, 4x, even 5x returns on Shorts ads are the ones who've embraced the format's constraints rather than fighting them. They're creating native content that happens to be sponsored, not ads that happen to be vertical.
Is it more work? Yes. Does it require new skills and different thinking? Absolutely. Is it worth it?
Depends on your audience. If they're scrolling through Shorts (and statistically, they probably are), then yes. The opportunity is there. The tools are there. The question is whether you're willing to adapt your approach.
Because here's the thing: YouTube Shorts isn't the future. It's the present. And the brands still debating whether to test it are already behind the ones who've been optimizing for six months.
Start small. Test aggressively. Learn fast. The algorithm rewards action, not perfection.
Top comments (0)