It's November 2025, which means finance wants your Q1 2026 budget by yesterday, and you're staring at a spreadsheet that somehow spent $180,000 on "digital marketing" with the specificity of a fortune cookie.
Here's the thing: most marketing teams aren't bad at budgeting because they're careless. They're bad at it because they're optimistic. That Facebook campaign that "performed well"? Define well. That content initiative that "built brand awareness"? Cool, cool—how much brand awareness costs per unit, exactly?
I've audited enough marketing budgets to know the pattern. Roughly 20-30% of annual spend goes to things that either don't work anymore, never worked, or nobody can actually remember approving. Not because marketers are reckless, but because priorities shift mid-year and nobody circles back to kill the zombie campaigns.
So let's fix that. Not with theory, but with the actual process I use when someone hands me a year's worth of marketing chaos and asks what to keep.
Start With the Uncomfortable Question: What Actually Drove Revenue?
Not engagement. Not impressions. Not the LinkedIn post that your CEO loved.
Revenue.
Pull your CRM data for 2025 and track backwards. Where did your closed deals actually come from? If you're using HubSpot, Salesforce, or any halfway decent platform, you can run a deal source report in about four minutes. Do that first.
What you're looking for: the gap between what you think works and what your data says works. In my experience, this gap is enormous and humbling. That webinar series you spent $40K on? Might have generated three SQLs. That scrappy email campaign you barely remember? Could be responsible for 30% of Q3 revenue.
Here's what surprised me when I ran this for a SaaS client last month: their highest-performing channel by revenue was organic search, which they'd been systematically defunding in favor of paid social. Their logic was that paid social had "better engagement metrics." Sure. And my cat has great engagement metrics with the laser pointer, but he's not paying my mortgage.
Document everything in a simple table:
- Channel/Initiative
- Total 2025 Spend
- Attributed Revenue
- Cost per Acquisition
- Revenue per Dollar Spent
Yes, attribution is messy. First-touch, last-touch, multi-touch—pick a model and stick with it. Perfect data doesn't exist, but directional data that's consistent beats perfect data you'll never have.
Audit Your Tool Stack (You're Paying for Things You Don't Use)
Let me guess: you have subscriptions to SEMrush, Ahrefs, three different social media schedulers, two email platforms (because you're "transitioning"), and that AI content tool everyone was excited about in March.
Log into your expense management system and filter for recurring charges. Everything that says "monthly" or "annual" goes on the audit list.
For each tool, ask:
- Did anyone use this in the last 60 days?
- Could we accomplish the same thing with a tool we already have?
- If we cancelled this tomorrow, would anyone notice by Friday?
A mid-size B2B company I worked with found $23,000 in annual subscriptions they'd forgotten about. Not small stuff either—a $400/month SEO platform that their former content manager had signed up for and nobody else knew how to use. They'd been paying for it for 18 months after she left.
The tool bloat is real, and it's expensive. This platform has 47 features, you'll use 3 of them, and those 3 are worth the price. But you don't need to pay for 47.
Look at Your Agency and Freelancer Spend
This one gets awkward because you probably like your agencies. They send nice holiday cards. Their account manager remembers your kids' names.
Doesn't matter. What matters is output versus cost.
For every agency or freelancer on retainer, calculate:
- Monthly retainer amount
- Actual deliverables received
- Market rate for those deliverables if you bought them a la carte
- Quality/performance of the work
I've seen retainers that made perfect sense in Q1 become completely inefficient by Q4 because scope changed but the contract didn't. You're paying for 10 blog posts a month but only using 6? That's $2,000-$4,000 per month you could reallocate.
The renegotiation conversation isn't fun, but it's necessary. Most good agencies would rather adjust scope than lose you entirely. The ones that won't? That tells you something.
Analyze Your Content Investment (The Stuff Nobody Reads)
Pull your Google Analytics and content performance data. Sort by traffic and conversions. Now scroll to the bottom.
See all that content with 47 views and a 95% bounce rate? You paid for that. Probably $500-$2,000 per piece if you're using decent writers.
Here's the uncomfortable math: if you published 100 pieces of content in 2025, roughly 20 of them drove 80% of your results. The other 80 pieces? They're just sitting there, occasionally showing up in search results for queries nobody cares about.
For Q1 2026, consider this: what if you published half as much content but spent twice as much per piece on the topics that actually perform? Wild concept, I know—prioritizing quality over quantity. Revolutionary stuff.
Look at your top 10 performing content pieces from 2025:
- What topics were they covering?
- What format were they in?
- What distribution channels worked?
- Can you create more content in those lanes?
This connects to broader principles about working smarter with AI-assisted content strategies, but the core insight is simple: do more of what works, less of what doesn't. Shocking, I know.
Review Your Paid Advertising Performance (Channel by Channel)
Google Ads, Facebook, LinkedIn, whatever you're running—pull the annual numbers and get specific.
For each paid channel:
- Total spend
- Total conversions (not clicks, conversions)
- Cost per conversion
- Conversion to customer rate
- Customer acquisition cost
- Lifetime value of acquired customers
The last two are critical. A $200 cost per lead sounds expensive until you realize those leads close at 30% and have a $15,000 LTV. Meanwhile, that $40 cost per lead from Facebook? They close at 2% and churn in six months.
I audited a campaign last quarter that looked phenomenal on paper—$50K spend, 2,000 leads, $25 cost per lead. Then we tracked those leads through the funnel. Conversion rate to customer: 0.8%. They'd spent $50,000 to acquire 16 customers. CAC of $3,125 for a product with a $2,400 LTV.
The math wasn't mathing, as the kids say.
Sometimes the expensive channel is actually the cheap channel, and the cheap channel is lighting money on fire. You won't know until you run the full numbers.
Identify Your Zombie Campaigns
These are my favorite. The campaigns that are still running because nobody explicitly turned them off.
Log into every advertising platform you use and check active campaigns. I guarantee you'll find at least one that should have been paused in July. It's still spending $50 a day, every day, generating leads that nobody follows up on because that product line got discontinued.
Same thing with marketing automation. Check your email workflows. How many are still running from initiatives you abandoned? I found one client sending a 7-email nurture sequence for a webinar that happened 14 months ago. The webinar recording wasn't even available anymore, but the emails kept going out, three times a week, to a list of 1,200 people who were probably wondering what they'd done to deserve this.
Zombie campaigns are pure waste. Kill them and reallocate that budget to literally anything else.
Calculate Your True Cost Per Channel
This is where it gets real. Most marketers only count direct costs—the ad spend, the tool subscription. But what about:
- Staff time managing the channel
- Agency fees for optimization
- Creative production costs
- Tools required to run it
- Reporting and analysis time
A LinkedIn campaign might show $10,000 in ad spend, but if your marketing manager spends 20 hours a month managing it, and you're paying an agency $2,000/month to optimize it, and you're using a $500/month creative tool, your real monthly cost is closer to $15,000.
That changes your ROI calculation significantly.
Make a complete cost inventory for each major channel. You might discover that your "cheap" channels are actually quite expensive when you factor in the human hours.
Build Your Q1 2026 Allocation Framework
Now that you know what worked and what didn't, here's how to allocate:
Tier 1 (60% of budget): Proven Performers
These are your channels with positive ROI and consistent performance. Fund them fully. If organic search drove 40% of revenue on 15% of budget, give it more. If your email campaigns consistently convert at 8%, double down.
Tier 2 (25% of budget): Promising Experiments
These are channels or tactics that showed potential but need more testing. Maybe you ran a pilot program that had decent results but insufficient data. Maybe you started something in Q4 that needs a full quarter to prove out. Fund these, but with clear success metrics and kill criteria.
Tier 3 (15% of budget): New Experiments
This is your innovation budget. New channels, new tactics, new ideas. Keep this relatively small and treat it like venture capital—expect most to fail, hope one hits big. But here's the key: actually kill the failures. Don't let them become zombie campaigns.
Tier 4 (0% of budget): Everything Else
If it didn't work in 2025 and you can't articulate a specific reason why Q1 2026 will be different, cut it. Yes, even if the CEO likes it. Especially if the CEO likes it but can't explain why.
Set Up Your Q1 Tracking System Now
The biggest mistake I see: teams do this whole audit, make smart allocation decisions, then forget to track performance monthly. By June, they have no idea if their Q1 bets paid off.
Set up a simple tracking dashboard now. I use a Google Sheet (fancy, I know) with:
- Channel/Initiative
- Monthly budget
- Monthly spend (actual)
- Key metrics (leads, conversions, revenue)
- ROI calculation
- Notes on what's working/not working
Update it monthly. Actually update it, not just open the tab and nod thoughtfully.
If something isn't working by end of January, you have two months to pivot. If you wait until March to check, you've burned through the whole quarter.
The Uncomfortable Conversations You Need to Have
Budget audits reveal uncomfortable truths. That channel your CMO loves? Might not work. That agency relationship you've maintained for three years? Might need to end. That content strategy you championed? Might need a complete overhaul.
Have these conversations in November, not March. Use data, not opinions. "I think this isn't working" loses to "this generated 12 leads at $400 each while our target is $150."
Bring solutions, not just problems. Instead of "our content strategy failed," try "our content strategy generated a 2% conversion rate on blog posts about X topic and 12% on Y topic—I recommend we shift 80% of Q1 content budget to Y."
Most executives will accept hard pivots if you show your work.
What This Actually Looks Like
Let me give you a real example. B2B SaaS company, $500K annual marketing budget, came to me in November 2024 for their 2025 planning.
Their 2024 spend:
- Paid social: $180K (36%)
- Content marketing: $120K (24%)
- Events/conferences: $100K (20%)
- SEO/organic: $60K (12%)
- Email marketing: $40K (8%)
Their 2024 revenue attribution:
- Organic search: 42%
- Email: 28%
- Paid social: 18%
- Events: 8%
- Other: 4%
See the problem? They were spending 36% of budget on paid social for 18% of revenue, while spending 12% on SEO that drove 42% of revenue.
We reallocated their 2025 budget:
- SEO/organic: $200K (40%)
- Email marketing: $120K (24%)
- Content marketing: $100K (20%)
- Paid social: $60K (12%)
- Experiments: $20K (4%)
Events got cut entirely. Controversial, but the ROI wasn't there and they needed the capital elsewhere.
Result through Q3 2025: revenue up 34%, CAC down 28%, and they still had $40K in unspent experiment budget they could deploy strategically in Q4.
That's what happens when you fund what works and kill what doesn't.
Your Next Steps
Here's what to do this week:
- Block four hours on your calendar (you'll need it)
- Pull your full 2025 spend data—every channel, every tool, every agency
- Pull your revenue attribution data
- Calculate true ROI for each major initiative
- Identify your top 3 performers and your bottom 3
- Draft your Q1 2026 allocation using the tier framework
- Schedule conversations with your CFO and leadership
Do this before December hits and everyone disappears into holiday mode. January is too late—budgets get locked, agencies get booked, and you lose negotiating leverage.
The best time to audit your marketing budget was six months ago. The second best time is right now, before you commit another quarter of resources to things that don't work.
And look, maybe your 2025 spend was perfect and everything performed exactly as planned. If so, congratulations—you're the first person I've met who can say that honestly. For everyone else, there's probably $30K sitting in your current budget that could be working a lot harder than it is.
Go find it.
Top comments (0)